57 Shops · 184,262+ Produkte

Vergleich: Gt Radial Fe2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Nass

Nass
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Handling - nass
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Komfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Außengeräusch
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Handling - trocken
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Rollwiderstand
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2023205/55 R16Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich