Vergleich: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Nass

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Aquaplaning - quer

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Handling - nass

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - längs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Nassbremsen

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kosten

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kilometerstand

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Komfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Innengeräusche

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Trocken

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Amazer 4G ECO

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen