56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
BFGoodrich
Advantage SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
2
21
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.5
11.9
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
25
161
34

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Offroad

Offroad
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich