Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Testprofil

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

13

2

3

—

Optimale Position

#8

#1

#2

—

Durchschnittliche Position

13.6

1.0

3.7

—

Neuester Test

2025

—

Verfügbare Größen

146

23

34

—

Nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - längs

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Handling - nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - quer

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kreisbahn nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Seitenführung

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen