56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Testprofil
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
14
13
18
10
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
6.2
6.1
6.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
146
225
47
104

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich