Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Nassbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Handling - nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - quer

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kreisbahn nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Seitenführung

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen