56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
18
3
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.6
4.8
6.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
146
136
47
34

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich