56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
10
18
11
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
6.0
6.1
11.6
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2024
2024
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
104
47
121

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich