Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Anzahl der Tests

14

—

4

3

Optimale Position

#8

—

#3

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

13.4

—

12.0

3.7

3.3

Neuester Test

2026

—

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

146

—

111

34

60

Nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Nassbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Aquaplaning - längs

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Handling - nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kreisbahn nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Seitenführung

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Trockenbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Handling - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Außengeräusch

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rollwiderstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kilometerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen