Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Advantage

Ventus Prime 4

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

13

4

—

Optimale Position

#8

#2

#3

—

Durchschnittliche Position

13.4

6.2

12.0

—

Neuester Test

2026

2025

—

Verfügbare Größen

146

530

111

—

Nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - längs

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Handling - nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nassleistung

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Seitenführung

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Trockenleistung

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Innengeräusche

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

Ventus Prime 4

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen