57 Shops · 184,262+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
76%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
88%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
91%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
97%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich