Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Toyo Proxes Comfort gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Aquaplaning - quer

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Nassbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Aquaplaning - längs

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Handling - nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kreisbahn nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Seitenführung

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Handling - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Außengeräusch

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Rollwiderstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kilometerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Preis-Wert

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Toyo Proxes Comfort

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Organisation	Jahreszeit	Jahr	Dimension
ADAC	Sommer	2023	205/55 R16	Ansehen

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Toyo Proxes Comfort gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Advantage

Proxes Comfort

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen