Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

14

—

Optimale Position

#1

—

Durchschnittliche Position

3.6

—

Neuester Test

2025

—

Verfügbare Größen

—

64

58

Nass

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - längs

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Nassbremsen

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - quer

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - nass

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Kreisbahn nass

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Schnee

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Schneetraktion

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Schnee Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Schnee Slalom

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Trocken

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Trockenleistung

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kosten

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Preis-Wert

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Komfort

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Komfort

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Innengeräusche

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Offroad

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Traktion Kies

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Offroad

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen