57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Turanza 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
15
4
18
10
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
6.1
6.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
229
40
47
109
111

Nass

Nass
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - längs
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Handling - nass
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kreisbahn nass
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Seitenführung
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Bridgestone Turanza 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
Bridgestone Turanza 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Komfort

Komfort
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Innengeräusche
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich