56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
21
18
6
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.8
3.3
11.9
6.1
4.7
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2024
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
40
164
47
146

Nass

Nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Seitenführung
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Handling - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Preis-Wert
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Innengeräusche
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich