56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Continental ContiPremiumContact 5Premium
ContinentalContinental

ContiPremiumContact 5

R14 – R17
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R21
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Testprofil

Testprofil
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
14
—
21
4
Optimale Position
#1
—
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.8
—
11.9
12.0
Neuester Test
2019
—
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
35
—
161
111

Nass

Nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Handling - nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Nassbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Seitenführung
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Handling - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kilometerstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Preis-Wert
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich