Vergleich: Falken Azenis RS820 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

Azenis RS820

VS

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

7.8

R15 – R21

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

UltraContact NXT

Nass

Falken Azenis RS820

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - längs

Falken Azenis RS820

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nassbremsen

Falken Azenis RS820

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Falken Azenis RS820

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Handling - nass

Falken Azenis RS820

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - quer

Falken Azenis RS820

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Trocken

Falken Azenis RS820

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Falken Azenis RS820

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

Falken Azenis RS820

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kosten

Falken Azenis RS820

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

Falken Azenis RS820

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Komfort

Falken Azenis RS820

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Falken Azenis RS820

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Falken Azenis RS820 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Azenis RS820

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen