56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
2
13
18
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.7
1.0
4.3
6.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
34
23
123
47
40

Nass

Nass
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Seitenführung
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Kreisbahn nass
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Trocken

Trocken
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich