Vergleich: Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraContact NXT

Anzahl der Tests

3

—

14

2

Optimale Position

#2

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.7

—

3.6

1.0

Neuester Test

2025

—

2025

Verfügbare Größen

34

—

23

Nass

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Nassbremsen

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - längs

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Handling - nass

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - quer

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Seitenführung

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Kreisbahn nass

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Trocken

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Trockenbremsen

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Handling - trocken

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kosten

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rollwiderstand

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometerstand

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Komfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Außengeräusch

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Komfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen