57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
3.3
3.7
4.8
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
40
36
158

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich