57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
5
3
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
3.3
2.8
3.7
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
35
40
139
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich