57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Destination HPObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
4
3
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
6.0
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
35
109
40
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone RoadhawkFirestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS SportFirestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen