57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
3
3
4
13
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.3
3.3
4.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
36
23
40
123

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich