57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
3
18
1
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
3.7
6.1
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
36
47
66
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen