57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
11
8
4
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#4
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
11.6
12.8
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
122
30
111
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen