56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
Primacy 5
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
2
36
18
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.5
3.1
6.1
12.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2023
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
59
153
126
296
47
111

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich