57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.6
R16 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
5
18
4
28
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
4.8
6.1
12.0
2.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
158
47
111
67
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen