56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
36
13
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.1
13.6
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
59
47
296
146

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich