57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Vredestein ULTRAC gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Vredestein ULTRAC Premium
VredesteinVredestein

ULTRAC

1.6
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta PS71Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

7.8
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
—
15
Optimale Position
#12
#2
—
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
—
9.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
—
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
—
226

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Vredestein ULTRAC
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Vredestein ULTRAC
45%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich