56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
18
Optimale Position
#12
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
13.6
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
59
64
146
47

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich