Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Hankook

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Multihawk 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen