57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
18
3
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
3.7
2.8
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
47
36
139
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich