56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
3
25
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
59
11
34
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Petlas Imperium PT515
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich