Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Budget

Petlas

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Turanza T005

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Imperium PT515

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

5

—

11

18

Optimale Position

#12

#13

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

24.0

—

11.6

6.1

Neuester Test

2018

2024

—

2024

Verfügbare Größen

59

11

—

121

47

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

Petlas Imperium PT515

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Petlas Imperium PT515

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Firestone Multihawk 2

76%

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Multihawk 2

Imperium PT515

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen