57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
9
18
4
4
4
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#2
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
5.8
6.1
12.0
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
11
92
47
111
40
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Petlas Imperium PT515
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen