56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.2
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
13
3
—
—
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#2
—
—
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.6
3.7
—
—
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
—
—
Verfügbare Größen
161
146
34
64
—

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich