55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Anzahl der Tests
21
13
36
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.6
3.1
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2023
Verfügbare Größen
161
146
296

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich