57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
14
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#8
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
13.4
12.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
153
111
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen