56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
2
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
1.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
161
47
23
111

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich