57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Turanza T005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Turanza T005

8.8
R14 – R23
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
16
3
33
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
5.5
3.7
4.1
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2023
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
153
36
658

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich