56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
21
3
10
18
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
6.0
6.1
12.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
164
40
104
47
111
126

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich