56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
18
18
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
6.1
6.1
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2024
2024
Verfügbare Größen
161
111
47
64
47

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich