57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
4
18
5
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
3.3
6.1
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
40
47
139

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich