Vergleich: Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Budget

Fulda

EcoControl HP2

VS

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofil

EcoControl HP2

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

Anzahl der Tests

8

24

14

Optimale Position

#4

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.8

2.7

3.6

Neuester Test

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

265

—

Nass

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Nassbremsen

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - längs

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Handling - nass

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kreisbahn nass

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Seitenführung

Fulda EcoControl HP2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Nassfahrverhalten

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Trocken

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Trockenbremsen

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Handling - trocken

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Trockenleistung

Fulda EcoControl HP2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Komfort

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Komfort

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Innengeräusche

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kosten

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kilometerstand

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Rollwiderstand

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Preis-Wert

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

EcoControl HP2

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen