56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Testprofil
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
18
13
36
4
Optimale Position
#1
#8
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
13.6
3.1
12.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
146
296
111

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2023205/55 R16Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich