55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.2
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2023205/55 R16Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich