56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Testprofil
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
18
14
9
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.6
5.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
47
104

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich