57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
23
5
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
176
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen