55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Testprofil
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
2
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
64
23

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich