57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
24
3
1
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
3.3
2.7
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
151
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen